Overtourism Is Redistributing Hotel Investment in 2026

TUI’s shift from Spain and Italy toward Egypt and Turkey looks like a single tour operator managing a booking problem. It is closer to a preview. The same capacity math is now steering hotel development, tax policy and construction permits on four continents.

Overtourism capacity limits are starting to move where hotel investment goes, not only where guests complain about it. TUI chief executive Sebastian Ebel has told the Wall Street Journal, as reported by several European outlets covering the interview, that Spain and Italy are approaching the physical limits of how many visitors they can absorb, and that demand is already shifting toward destinations with room to grow, including Egypt and Turkey. That is one executive describing one company’s booking allocation. But government policy in Tokyo, Bali, Reykjavik, Lima and Amsterdam has been moving in the same direction throughout 2025 and 2026, independently of TUI and mostly before Ebel’s comments made headlines. For a GM building next year’s budget or a revenue manager setting a 2027 rate strategy, the relevant question is no longer whether a destination is popular. It is whether the destination still has room to grow — and, if not, which market is absorbing the growth instead.

Table of Contents

When TUI Says Spain Is “Full,” It Isn’t Talking About Rooms

Spain is on track to receive roughly 100 million international arrivals this year, and both Spain and Italy are reporting high occupancy at their best-known sites, alongside recurring protests against mass tourism in cities including Barcelona and across the Canary Islands. TUI has told investors it is steering late bookers this summer toward Turkey, Cyprus and Egypt, where Ebel said there is “still a lot of capacity.” Governments in both countries have responded with higher tourist taxes and tighter rules on short-term rentals and cruise arrivals.

“Capacity,” in this context, was never only about hotel bed count. Six separate constraints are doing the work: airport and transport congestion, water availability, housing pressure that has turned political, hospitality staff shortages, formal restrictions on new tourism development, and public tolerance for visitors. The labour piece is measurable on its own. HOTREC, the European hospitality and restaurant trade association, reported in a January 2026 position paper that the sector — 10 million jobs across more than 2 million businesses in the EU — is short roughly 10% of its workforce on average, with the gap most acute in tourism-dependent southern economies. Spanish hospitality employers were still warning of recruitment shortfalls heading into the 2026 summer season despite record national employment.

For hotels already trading in Spain and Italy, this combination compresses the usual growth levers. Occupancy in peak months is close to its practical ceiling, so further revenue growth has to come from average daily rate, and rate has its own limits before demand softens. Labour cost inflation and new tourist-tax pass-through pressure margin from the other direction. Meanwhile, tour operators reallocating flight and hotel allotments toward Egypt, Cyprus and Turkey change the acquisition-cost and commission-cost picture for properties on both sides of that shift: contracted volume in Spain and Italy may plateau, while hotels in the receiving markets gain occupancy from operator allotments, often at wholesale rates that constrain rate growth and margin unless the property also builds a direct and OTA channel mix independent of the tour-operator relationship.

Worth watching is that tour-operator capacity announcements — which flights and allotments a company like TUI is moving, and where — tend to lead STR and CoStar occupancy data by a booking cycle. For hotels contracted with the major European operators, allotment and flight-programme announcements are a more current signal of demand redistribution than trailing performance data.

Nine Destinations, One Pattern

Spain and Italy are not an isolated case. Through 2025 and into 2026, Japan, Iceland, the Netherlands, Greece, Thailand, Indonesia and Peru have each tightened some combination of visitor taxes, cruise limits, daily entry caps and short-term-rental rules, using the same toolkit for the same underlying reason.

Japan tripled its international departure tax from ¥1,000 to ¥3,000 on July 1, 2026, with the additional roughly ¥70 billion in annual revenue earmarked for overtourism countermeasures and infrastructure. Kyoto raised its accommodation tax as part of the same wave, with the top tier rising sharply for luxury stays. Iceland has introduced visitor taxes and is weighing further fees on natural attractions, joining the same policy family as Spain, Italy and Japan. Peru’s Ministry of Culture has set a hard daily cap at Machu Picchu — 4,500 visitors on standard days, rising to 5,600 on a defined set of peak dates through a resolution published in late 2025 — sold almost entirely through an online booking platform, with a small in-person allocation for next-day entry. Amsterdam has frozen net hotel-bed growth city-wide (a new hotel may open only if an equivalent one closes) and cut the annual short-term-rental limit in its central districts from 30 nights to 15, effective April 2026. Thailand is rolling out a 300-baht entry fee for air arrivals, after years of delay, alongside its existing accommodation and airport levies.

Each tool lands on a different line of a hotel’s income statement, and the differences matter more than the shared “overtourism crackdown” headline suggests. Taxes and entry fees raise the total cost of a trip without directly touching hotel revenue — they are largely a pass-through — but a sufficiently sharp increase, such as Japan’s tripled departure tax or Kyoto’s steepened luxury accommodation tax, can shift group and MICE budgets toward a competing city within the same country before it changes anyone’s mind about visiting the country at all. Construction moratoriums and “no net new beds” rules work on the supply side instead: Amsterdam’s policy caps competitive room growth, which — assuming demand holds, and Amsterdam’s own overnight-stay numbers suggest it has — supports pricing power for hotels that already hold a licence, turning an existing permit into a scarcer asset than it was when it was issued. Hard visitor caps such as Machu Picchu’s operate differently again: they put a mathematical ceiling on the addressable overnight market in the gateway town, meaning occupancy growth in Aguas Calientes depends on booking-window compliance and access to the online allocation system, not on marketing spend.

Japan Turned Its Capacity Limits Into a Zoning Tool

Japan’s Cabinet approved a revised five-year Tourism Nation Promotion Basic Plan on March 27, 2026, covering fiscal years 2026 through 2030. The plan keeps Japan’s growth ambitions intact — 60 million annual visitors and ¥15 trillion in visitor spending by 2030, up from roughly 42.68 million visitors and ¥9.5 trillion in 2025 — but for the first time sets a numeric target for overtourism management itself: expanding the number of regions actively implementing countermeasures from 47 to 100. The plan’s own framing explicitly weighs continued visitor growth against residents’ quality of life, a policy-level version of the public resistance already visible in protests elsewhere. Revenue from the tripled departure tax is earmarked in part to fund exactly this regional dispersal work.

This is a demand-steering exercise with a direct hotel-development corollary. Tokyo, Kyoto and Osaka now carry the highest accommodation-tax tiers, the most visible congestion, and a growing list of behaviour restrictions — Kyoto’s Gion district has added photography limits in its residential alleys — that show up as guest-experience friction even where headline demand remains strong. At the same time, national tourism-agency marketing and airline fare promotions are increasingly favouring secondary cities: Kanazawa, Matsumoto, Takayama and destinations across Kyushu and Tohoku are reporting double-digit year-on-year growth in overseas arrivals, from a much lower base. For a hotel group deciding where to add rooms in Japan, the practical signal is a widening cost-and-friction gap between the golden-route cities and the secondary markets, even though Tokyo, Kyoto and Osaka remain the higher-ADR markets in absolute terms today. The number worth tracking is brand and franchise signings in the secondary cities specifically, since a national dispersal target of “100 regions” is a policy input, not a guarantee that capital follows.

Bali Is Building a Second Front Door

Bali has combined two tools that other destinations are using separately. The first is a moratorium on new hotel, villa, restaurant and nightclub permits on agricultural and water-catchment land, formalised as executive policy after severe flooding in late 2025 and covering six districts as of March 2026, with previously approved projects grandfathered in. The measure followed years of back-and-forth — proposed in 2024, floated at up to ten years’ duration, repeatedly narrowed and widened — and was driven in large part by the same water and infrastructure strain that has forced Bali to lose roughly 1,000 hectares of agricultural land a year to development.

The second tool is a long-delayed second airport in Buleleng Regency, in Bali’s north, revived under President Prabowo Subianto with an estimated $3 billion in committed investment and a target capacity of 30–32 million annual passengers. Indonesia’s transportation minister has described the project explicitly as a way to let northern Bali “grow and keep up with southern Bali,” easing pressure on Ngurah Rai International Airport, whose southern location has concentrated tourism — and hotel investment — in the Denpasar-Badung-Gianyar corridor for decades.

The moratorium constrains new competitive supply in south Bali now, which supports pricing power for hotels that already hold permits in Seminyak, Canggu and Uluwatu even as it caps their own room-count growth. The airport is a different kind of asset entirely: construction timelines have slipped repeatedly since the project was first proposed in 2013 — it was dropped from Indonesia’s national strategic project list in 2022 and revived only in 2024 — and realistic completion sits around 2027 to 2028 by most current estimates. For now it functions mainly as a land-price and investment-thesis signal in Lovina, Singaraja and Kubutambahan, where prices have already moved on anticipation alone, rather than as a near-term driver of bookable demand. The near-term capacity constraint in Bali is real and binding today; the offsetting capacity release is a multi-year bet, not a current pipeline input, and the moratorium’s own history of being proposed, cancelled and reinstated since 2024 is a reasonable caution against treating either side of the story as settled.

What the Construction Pipeline Actually Shows

Policy is one kind of evidence. Committed capital is another, and the two do not move in lockstep. Turkey welcomed a record 63.94 million total visitors in 2025 and $65.23 billion in tourism revenue, according to Turkish Culture and Tourism Ministry data. Egypt received close to 19 million tourists in 2025, a 21% increase, with UN Tourism’s World Tourism Barometer crediting Egypt with the strongest arrivals growth of any Middle Eastern destination that year, at 20%. Both figures sit well above the two countries’ pre-2025 trend lines and arrived independently of TUI’s public comments on capacity.

Hotel investment has followed. Egypt’s branded hotel pipeline grew 35.5% year over year, according to W Hospitality Group’s “Hotel Chain Development Pipelines in Africa 2026” report, reaching 185 hotels and 45,984 rooms — 37.1% of the entire African pipeline. IHG has said 90% of its Middle East pipeline sits across Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Turkey. Lodging Econometrics’ second-quarter 2026 tracking put the broader Middle East construction pipeline at an all-time high:

Middle East Hotel Construction Pipeline by Stage, Q2 2026 (Lodging Econometrics)

Pipeline Stage	Projects	Rooms	Share of Pipeline
Under construction	330	82,353	46%
Scheduled to start within 12 months	173	52,678	29%
Early planning	221	42,972	24%
Total	724	178,003	100%

The total is up 11% by project count and 10% by room count year over year, with Saudi Arabia accounting for more than half the regional pipeline.

The complication worth stating plainly: this is not a clean substitution story, and the evidence does not support treating it as one. CoStar’s own September 2025 pipeline snapshot found Europe was the only world region to show an increase in overall hotel construction and pipeline activity that quarter — even as Spain and Italy were being described as near capacity. STR and Tourism Economics subsequently upgraded, rather than cut, their 2026 European RevPAR forecast, to 1.1% growth. Capital is not simply draining out of saturated markets into frontier ones; it is doing both at once, for reasons that are partly independent of each other. Saudi Arabia’s pipeline growth long predates Spain’s capacity story and has its own drivers — sovereign investment targets, a domestic events calendar, giga-project development — that would exist with or without a single tourist leaving Mallorca. The practical implication for an owner-operator underwriting a new market is to treat Egypt, Turkey, Bali’s north or Japan’s secondary cities as growth opportunities that need to justify themselves on their own economics, not as overflow that will arrive automatically once a saturated market fills up.

The Question the Data Doesn’t Yet Answer

Hotel executives weighing multi-year capital commitments to any of these markets are, whether they frame it this way or not, taking a position on one unresolved question: is the 2026 wave of caps, taxes and moratoriums a durable, engineered redistribution of tourism demand and hotel investment, or a cyclical adjustment that eases once the current round of infrastructure and mitigation spending is finished and traveller habits settle back down?

The evidence cuts both ways, and it would be premature to call it. Amsterdam’s own 20-million overnight-stay target has been exceeded every year since it was set, and the city told a court earlier this year that the figure was never a legally enforceable limit in the first place — a sign that underlying demand pressure persists regardless of stated policy ceilings. Japan’s plan, by contrast, ties its dispersal targets to funded infrastructure, a tripled tax stream and a reservation-system rollout at named sites, which points toward something closer to an engineered, multi-year redistribution rather than a temporary correction. Both dynamics are visible in the same 2026 dataset. What the industry does not yet have is enough post-implementation performance data — occupancy, ADR and pipeline behaviour in the receiving markets over more than one or two seasons — to say which pattern will dominate. That data starts to arrive over the next two to three reporting cycles, and it is worth watching by market rather than assuming the global pattern will resolve the same way everywhere at once.

Data Source