Hotel Development Pipeline 2026: Why Early-Planning Projects Are Piling Up While Construction Stalls in the US and Europe

Low-angle black and white shot of modern high-rise buildings under construction with tower cranes against a cloudy sky.

by

The Hotel Blueprint

Investor appetite for hotels is about as strong as it has been in years. The credit needed to turn that appetite into finished rooms has not kept pace โ€” and the resulting gap is now something a general manager has to manage, not simply wait out.

The hotel development pipeline has split in two. Projects sitting in early planning โ€” the stage before a site is closed, a loan is signed, or a permit is pulled โ€” reached a record 604 projects and 86,128 rooms across Europe at the close of the first quarter of 2026, up 14% by project count and 16% by rooms year-over-year, according to Lodging Econometrics. Groundbreaking has not kept pace: rooms actually under construction in Europe grew only 3% over the same period, and in the United States, CoStar’s construction tracking has now shown fifteen consecutive months of decline. This is not a story about nervous investors โ€” hotel transaction volumes in most major markets are running at some of their strongest levels in a decade. It is a story about the growing distance between wanting to build a hotel and being able to finance one, and for anyone opening a property in 2027 or 2028, that distance is now the thing to manage.

1. The Planning Stage Has Never Been Fuller โ€” or Less Predictive

A hotel construction pipeline is tracked in stages: early planning, projects scheduled to start within 12 months, projects actually under construction, and new openings. At the close of Q1 2026, Europe’s total pipeline stood at 1,731 projects and 255,354 rooms, a 3% increase year-over-year in both measures (Lodging Econometrics, Europe Hotel Construction Pipeline Trend Report, Q1 2026). But that modest, healthy-looking 3% headline hides a lopsided pipeline.

Europe hotel pipeline by stage, Q1 2026ProjectsRoomsYoY change (projects)
Under construction792119,106+3%
Scheduled to start within 12 months33550,120โ€”
Early planning60486,128+14% (record high)

Source: Lodging Econometrics, Europe Hotel Construction Pipeline Trend Report, Q1 2026

The front end of the funnel โ€” early planning โ€” is growing four to five times faster than the back end. The UK, Turkey, Germany, France and Portugal account for the bulk of that early-stage growth, with Turkey and Lisbon both posting record counts.

For a GM tracking competitive supply, or a revenue manager building a multi-year RevPAR-index forecast, this matters directly: a project counted in “pipeline” headlines is not equally likely to open. A hotel in early planning has not bought its site, signed its loan, or fixed its brand. Treating early-planning rooms as near-term competitive supply โ€” the way a simple pipeline total invites you to โ€” overstates how much new inventory is actually coming to a market in the next 24 months. The same logic cuts the other way for a GM’s own project: if your opening date was set based on an “early planning” or even a “scheduled to start” milestone, that date carries real uncertainty, because a large and growing share of the pipeline it’s benchmarked against gets stuck at exactly that stage.

What is worth watching is not pipeline size but pipeline composition: the ratio of a market’s under-construction and next-12-month stages relative to its total. A market where early planning dominates the mix is signaling developer intent, not imminent supply โ€” a distinction that matters for anyone setting a three-year rate strategy against “the pipeline.”

2. Why the Money Stops at the Door

The gap between planning and pouring concrete has an identifiable cause: a hotel loan market that has become considerably more selective about which projects it will fund, and when. Roughly $48 billion in CMBS-era hotel loans are maturing between 2025 and 2026, a wave that is forcing refinancing at rates well above what many owners locked in years ago โ€” often 40% higher in debt-service terms than the original loan, according to Savills and Morningstar commentary reported in Hospitality Investor (Hospitality Investor, “Are hotels ready for the next refinancing round?”, February 2026). That wave is absorbing lender attention and balance-sheet capacity that would otherwise go toward new construction.

HVS’s own Q1 2026 debt market briefing shows the split in practice: senior loans for stabilized, already-operating hotels are available at 55โ€“65% loan-to-value with margins around 165โ€“375 basis points over benchmark rates and five- to seven-year terms. Ground-up development financing, by contrast, still routinely requires personal or corporate guarantees and far more conservative structuring, and appetite is concentrated on sponsors with existing lender relationships and brand-affiliated assets (HVS, Hotel Debt Market Briefing Q1 2026, via Hospitality Net, January 2026). CoStar’s own reporting adds a second constraint: the average hotel now takes more than 23 months to build, up from historical norms, meaning every month a project spends waiting on financing adds real interest-carry cost on top of construction-cost inflation (CoStar, “Smarter and more selective: How hotel construction capital is evolving heading into 2026,” November 2025).

The commercial consequence lands squarely on project economics and, eventually, on the operator’s P&L. Every additional month between “financing planned” and “financing closed” adds carrying cost to total development budget and delays the date rooms start generating fee or lease revenue at all. For an operator already running an existing asset nearby, the same slowdown is a tailwind: aggregate near-term new competitive supply is smaller than headline pipeline totals suggest, which supports occupancy and rate at hotels already open and trading.

What is worth watching locally is the maturity calendar, not just the construction calendar. A market with a large share of hotel loans originated in the low-rate 2015โ€“2021 window coming due in 2025โ€“2026 is a market where forced sales, loan extensions, or refinancing stress are more likely to show up before new construction does โ€” a leading indicator that says more about near-term competitive dynamics than pipeline counts do.

3. Investors Still Want Hotels โ€” Just Not the Ones That Don’t Exist Yet

None of this reflects a retreat from hospitality as an asset class. JLL’s 2026 Global Hotel Investment Outlook found that global hotel transaction volumes rose 22% in 2025 from the 2023 trough, with the Americas up 27% and EMEA up 4%, and it explicitly frames slowing supply growth as a value driver: most major US cities now have construction pipelines below 2% of existing room supply (JLL, 2026 Global Hotel Investment Outlook, February 2026). Cushman & Wakefield’s European Hotel Investor Compass, a survey of 74 institutional investors who collectively deployed roughly โ‚ฌ18 billion into European hotels between 2020 and 2025, found 86% plan to deploy equal or greater capital in 2026 and average loan-to-value on deals ticking up to 51% from 49% the year before (Cushman & Wakefield, European Hotel Investor Compass 2026, March 2026). CBRE’s European Hotel Investor Intentions Survey found more than 90% of investors expect to hold or increase their hotel exposure this year.

It is worth being precise about what is driving that appetite, because the picture is not uniform. Europe’s underlying operating performance genuinely supports it: STR and Cushman & Wakefield’s Hotel Barometer put full-year 2025 European RevPAR growth at 2.1%, with Spain notably ahead at 5.5% and occupancy holding near 76% (STR/Cushman & Wakefield, Hotel Barometer, full-year 2025). The US case is weaker on the numbers: STR and CoStar’s final 2025 read showed occupancy at 62.3% and ADR up just 0.8%, with full-year RevPAR actually down 0.4% โ€” the first annual US RevPAR decline outside 2020 and 2009 (STR/CoStar/Tourism Economics, US hotel forecast revision, December 2025). Investor capital is still flowing into US hotels in scale, but it is being drawn more by structural scarcity and relative yield than by blistering current performance.

Either way, the commercial consequence for an operator is the same: this capital is chasing hotels that already exist, through acquisition, not funding hotels that don’t. Valuations and pricing power at already-open assets are being supported by scarcity of new competitive supply, while an unbuilt project competes for a smaller and considerably pickier slice of development capital.

What is worth watching is the widening spread between transaction-volume growth (buying existing rooms) and construction-start growth (building new ones) in a given market. Where that spread keeps widening, it is a reasonably reliable signal that new competitive supply will arrive later โ€” and more slowly โ€” than published pipeline totals imply.

4. The Chains Have Found a Detour: Growing Without Waiting to Build

Marriott and Accor illustrate how the largest operators are routing around the financing bottleneck rather than solving it. Marriott’s own Q1 2026 results reported a record worldwide development pipeline of nearly 618,000 rooms across 4,107 properties, with 43% of those pipeline rooms already under construction, including conversions; conversions made up more than 35% of signings and over 40% of openings for the quarter (Marriott International, Form 8-K, Q1 2026 earnings release, May 2026). Accor’s Q1 2026 revenue release showed a network of 879,676 rooms and a pipeline of 260,000 rooms across 1,545 hotels, with its Premium, Midscale & Economy division now 53% franchised โ€” up two points year-over-year โ€” as the group continues shifting new growth toward franchise and conversion deals (Accor, First-Quarter 2026 Revenue release, April 2026).

The mechanism is straightforward: both companies operate asset-light models, earning franchise and management fees rather than owning the real estate, so ground-up construction financing is technically the property owner’s problem, not the brand’s. But both are actively steering growth toward conversions and franchise signings precisely because that route sidesteps a multi-year construction and financing timeline โ€” an existing building can be rebranded and opened in months, not years.

For an operator, the commercial consequence cuts two ways. Joining a system through conversion can compress time-to-open and time-to-fee-generation dramatically versus a new-build affiliation. But it also shifts the gating cost from construction financing to property-improvement-plan spend and brand-standard compliance โ€” a different line item, not a smaller one. And for competitive forecasting, it means a brand’s headline pipeline growth increasingly reflects relabeled existing rooms rather than net-new supply.

What is worth watching is a brand’s conversion share of signings and openings as a leading indicator of how much of its reported growth is genuinely new competitive supply, since that number now diverges sharply by company and by segment.

5. Where Independents Are Finding Room to Move

Smaller, independent groups are not competing with Marriott or Accor for the same capital โ€” and that turns out to be an advantage. A $15โ€“40 million single-asset deal can clear a regional or community bank’s credit committee, or be pieced together from layered sources, in ways a $200 million branded-tower syndication cannot. CoStar’s reporting on 2026 construction financing describes developers combining Small Business Administration and USDA loans with Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (C-PACE) financing to fund branded projects that would otherwise stall โ€” Peachtree Group, for instance, recently paired USDA loans with C-PACE debt to finance two adjacent hotels on separate tax parcels, maximizing available funding per property (CoStar, “Alternative Financing Expands for Hotel Projects as Traditional Lending Tightens,” via Hotel News Resource, June 2026). The same reporting notes a surge in EB-5 capital targeting rural development sites ahead of a September 2026 change to program rules, according to Ryan Bosch, principal at Arriba Capital.

Bespoke, project-specific structuring is showing up on the ground, too: HVS Debt Advisory arranged a large development financing facility in the fourth quarter of 2025 for an ultra-luxury hotel and villa retreat near Lisbon, tailored to that project’s scale and phasing rather than fit into a standardized bank product (HVS, Hotel Debt Market Briefing Q1 2026, via Hospitality Net, January 2026).

The commercial consequence is that deal size, more than brand affiliation, increasingly determines who can actually close financing and start construction. A single-asset independent project can stack government-backed debt, C-PACE, and a regional bank relationship in a way that scales down; a large branded portfolio deal generally cannot scale up into the same lender pool. That is the “agility” a small group can genuinely bring to 2026 conditions โ€” not lower costs of capital, but a wider set of lenders willing to look at a smaller check.

What is worth watching is whether this layered, project-by-project financing approach โ€” EB-5, C-PACE, USDA, regional banks, each filling a gap the others leave โ€” keeps expanding as a share of small-hotel construction financing, and whether regional and community banks re-enter development lending more broadly as the current wave of CMBS-era loans works through the system over the rest of 2026.

6. Managing a Timeline That Won’t Hold Still

Put together, a project’s real path from early planning through a closed loan to an open hotel is now longer and less certain than it was during the 2021โ€“2022 cycle, and increasingly for reasons that have nothing to do with the property, its brand, or its market โ€” a financing calendar, not a construction schedule, is often what actually decides the opening date.

That has a direct P&L consequence for anyone brought in ahead of an opening. Pre-opening budgets, staffing ramp-up plans, and marketing launch spend built around a fixed date carry real exposure when that date is elastic: a GM hired and a team ramped months ahead of an opening that slips shows up as pre-opening cost overrun with no offsetting revenue.

Some ownership groups are already adjusting for this by treating date slippage as a base-case scenario in GM contracts and staffing commitments, rather than an exception to plan around after the fact, and by shifting the conversation with lenders and boards from “when does it open” to “under what financing condition does it open.” For an opening GM in 2026, reading a project’s stage in the pipeline correctly โ€” and knowing which of early planning, scheduled, or under construction it actually sits in โ€” is no longer a development-team concern. It has become part of the job.

Data Source

Most read

OUR PUBLICATIONS

Also to discover